Saturday, January 7, 2012

Don’t be afraid of the dark


It was meant to be remembered for other reasons.  My friend Ben hadn’t been to his beloved Anfield for over 20 years, whilst it was my first time in the famous stadium.  Maybe - just maybe - Oldham’s underdogs would cause a famous upset.  Could this be a night of which FA Cup dreams are made? 

Travelling north we talked a bit about politics, the long-overdue Stephen Lawrence convictions, Diane Abbott’s ill-advised comments.  But mainly we luxuriated in footy chat:  could Liverpool survive with Suarez banned for racist abuse? might plucky Oldham spring a surprise?  most pressingly, would they let us bring our own crisps into the ground?

It didn’t disappoint.  Our snacks passed unconfiscated.  And on the half hour the unthinkable:  Oldham fired home a magnificent strike.  I yelled and punched the air – but only in my head, as I was in the middle of the Liverpool end (all visitor tickets sold within hours).  Latics fans were even beating the stunned home supporters on banter, chorusing ‘Where’s your famous atmosphere?’ to usually chirpy scousers.

But it didn’t last.  Liverpool were strong, even without their talisman Suarez.  Led by the impressive Steven Gerrard they were back on level terms in minutes, and went on the score four more (all flukey offside deflections). 

I must say it was a moving experience – the crowd clearly worshipped ‘King’ Kenny Dalglish, chorused ‘you’ll never walk alone’ with every scarf unfurled, and ended with a moving rendition of ‘stand up for the 96’, in memory of those killed in the Hillsborough disaster.

Yet this match will be remembered for all the wrong reasons.  Just ten minutes from the end, Oldham defender Tom Adeyemi raced towards the Kop end, pointing angrily.  The game was stopped for several minutes, and it took players from both sides to eventually calm him.

What had happened?  Maybe someone threw a coin?  Was is something someone said?  In the media buzz afterwards it transpires Adeyemi complained of being racially abused by one or more fans.  Apparently they were wearing Luis Suarez shirts. Police are investigating.  Oh dear.

The taxi driver returning us to the station was angry.  “This is a decent club, a family club.  This is the last thing we need. Suarez was bad enough, but this - what were they thinking?”.

But is this really a surprise, given the terrible example the club set to their own fans? 

Presented with irrefutable proof of Suarez repeated racial abuse of Evra, Liverpool failed to come clean.  Instead they shamefully squirmed, trying to defend the indefensible, refusing to criticise the clear wrong their star player had done. 

Their defence that the word ‘negro’ may sometimes be used affectionately in south America may be strictly-speaking true.  After all, I was referred to as mzugu (white man) when working and travelling in East Africa, and it felt like a (rather obvious) statement of fact, not abuse.  Friends even called my Rwanadan colleague mzungu after he saved enough money to build a house fit for a rich whitey!  Cambodia was the same:  constantly being called barraing (Frenchy) was a little irritating - wasn’t there anything more important by which to define me (the kind volunteer? the potato eater? the crazy cyclist? the super footballer?), but I never felt abused.

But Suarez’s defence was a pathetically disingenuous smokescreen.  The fact that it was used seven times during a heated argument, including the phrase "no hablo con los negros" (I don’t talk to blacks), shows this was simply ugly, racist abuse.

I can’t say I’m surprised – Suarez may be a great talent, but his history of bad behaviour is a matter of record.  I was particularly sickened by his unashamed cheating during the World Cup, and very dubious as to whether he should be forgiven and given a fresh chance to impress in the Premiership.

Now I’m a safe distance from Merseyside, I have to say that I think Kenny Dalglish got this very wrong. Perhaps he can’t be blamed for taking a chance on signing a flawed genius.  But a true leader would have ensured Suarez understood and quickly admitted his wrongdoing, and made a proper apology.  Failing this, he should have sacked Suarez:  he may be his best player, but no player is bigger than the club. 

Sure, Kenny was badly advised – but he was also weak and unprincipled, unusual and disappointing in such a great player and manager.

The ultimate irony was to hear fans from Oldham – place of my birth, and scene of some of Britain’s most recent and shameful race riots – chanting to Liverpool ‘you’re just a club full of racists’.

They’re not – but they need to do a much better job of showing it.

5 comments:

  1. From Clive:
    Brilliant footy blog Oliver… well written, informative and balanced… class!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hmmm! Delayed response as laptop memory being eaten by photos on my computer, compounded by lack of internet and had a cold last few days!! Think following football between 3 and 5 in the morning is bad for my health! I noticed you also didn't respond to my provocative text! I - was put up to it by Alison's bro! I'm afraid I have to agree with you Oly - very sad to see all this and particularly the fan's appalling behaviour in your presence! It's interesting that the Liverpool website kept saying there was stuff not being reported but they didn't want to get into trouble - seemed to suggest Evra said inappropriate things first...this seems to be KK's justification for his stance. This does not, of course, excuse Suarez's behaviour. In addition, saying it's how he talks back home is ridiculous - Liverpool should have in country training like VSO does and make it very clear what is and isn't acceptable. Interestingly and also sadly, John and I watched some of the Manchester derby at the Score bar the other night. Most people enjoyed the football, clapped and cheered appropriately etc. but one person (with the aid of his friends) was shouting the most foul obscenities at the top of his voice throughout the match - these included repeated references to the Munich air disaster as well as "gingerist" comments about Paul Scholes and apparently, Rooney is a scouse, potato head ....!!! The Cambodians (Sokha types)nearby looked mystified and horrified as indeed was I! It's at times like that that I wish I was an "Arnie" character and could have "had a word" with him! Hopefully, this doesn't mean that all Man City supporters behave like him nor, indeed, all English men as he represents foreigners to Cambodians. Hopefully, as your taxi driver said, the family values of Liverpool will prevail and if Suarez eventually leaves, I would miss his pretty football but not his pretty misses!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good points Mr Paul! Yes of course, all clubs have some bad apples, and Liverpool has a long and proud reputation. Thanks for sharing the interesting link to Kenny Dalglish's response on www.liverpoolfc.tv:

    "Over the past few weeks there has been a perception that the football club isn't doing what it should be doing, but I don't think the football club would ever go down that road. We will always support the official campaigns related to racism".

    "Obviously there was a big issue with Luis. The players showed support for Luis which was fantastic, but then some people interpreted that wrongly as the players saying they're not interested in the fight against racism. That is totally and utterly rubbish. If we can help to eradicate racism or discrimination from any part of the society, with the help of anybody at Liverpool Football Club, then that help will be forthcoming".

    Hmmm! Sorry Paul, he's a great man but to me these are weasel words. There is indeed a perception that the club wasn't doing what it should - because it wasn't. It should have been taking a stand against racism (and against arrogant overpaid primadonnas whilst they were at it). The words - club before player - are good. But the actions were the opposite - player before club.

    And he talks about the players showing support for Suarez - but that's dodging the issue too: the problem is not the players, it's him! It was the management (Dalglish) who mistakenly gave their unreserved support.

    So what will he do now? Accept they got it wrong? A proper apology? Action to clamp down on anyone, players or fans, who transgress? Naah, just a promise to 'support the official campaigns'. Oooh, those racists must really be quaking in their jackboots Kenny!

    I stick with my conclusion - Liverpool aren't a racist club, but they still (still!) haven't woken up and starting showing it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. From Ben:

    Coming as usual late to the party, I have finally got to reading your excellent blog. I do think it is very good and, loyalty to KK aside, I do not necessarily disagree with the conclusion.

    I can also however I think see the Suarez debacle from a slightly different perspective. I think we do have to be careful to be clear as to the basis for the criticism of Liverpool's handling of the affair.

    Clearly it wasn't clever from a PR perspective. Equally however- and this is probably I admit a bit of a lawyer's argument - I do think they were quite entitled to stand behind their player, to be advocates for his account and cause, pending the tribunal hearing, without being criticised themselves for in some way, directly or indirectly, endorsing racism.

    Without sounding trite, he was entitled to be presumed innocent and he was entitled to have his position represented and advocated, including by his employers, should they see so fit. If ultimately he lost his case, so be it, but that outcome may not have appeared inevitable- any lawyer will tell you that it is only when all of the evidence is actually heard that the position (sometimes) becomes clear- and even if this were the likely outcome, Liverpool were in my view quite entitled to back their player.

    It may be, from a PR perspective, that that decision has backfired, but it is equally wrong I think for the media to appear to have conflated that misjudgement (if it was one) with some sort of failure by Liverpool to stand up to racism.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kenny Dalglish should choose his role-models more wisely:

    less Arsene Wenger (‘I didn’t see it’) or Alex Ferguson (‘It’s a conspiracy against us’),

    more Mancini (‘He’s talented but a tosser and noone’s bigger than the club’)... or even Capello (‘I have principles - I was overruled by my bosses, so I quit’).

    Badly managed - time to go Kenny?

    http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/blogs/early-doors/liverpool-finally-show-leadership-090038716.html

    ReplyDelete