After living in poor, 'uncivilized' countries
for the past three years, I have to admit I’m thoroughly enjoying being in a rich and developed one
again - for the timebeing at least!
It’s great to be close to family and
friends again (the blighters refused to put their lives on hold whilst I was
away). I’m loving the cultural
opportunities – theatre, cinema, galleries, watching (and playing) football.
Major benefits also include the absence of
landmines, border wars, rampant corruption, poor people with no medical care, and
peasants with backbreaking, heartbreaking struggles through the mud.
There are little mercies too: snuggling
under a duvet beats sweating under a mozzie net. Cycling over a twig is more relaxing knowing it's not a snake. Drinking
water from the tap. Chocolate and cheese.
Electricity and internet. Freedom
from being pointed out and laughed at (well, less often). Dammit, we even have pavements and public
toilets!
Perhaps one of the biggest pleasures is
transport. The UK has (much
improved) trains, whereas there are none in Cambodia, or indeed Rwanda where I was
before. Busses and taxis here are modern,
frequent and safe. Occasionally
there are even wonderful things called cycle lanes!
In contrast, Cambodia has developed a transport
problem. In the absence of public
transport, cars have sadly become a status symbol. You must be rich to have one; you don’t
get rich by being nice; so cars aren’t driven nicely (might is right, and if
you own a car you’re a big man and perfectly entitled to drive like one). When not hogging the roads, they
block the way for others. In a
previous post I complained that “only tossers of the highest order park cars on
pavements; sadly, Phnom Penh has multitudes of major culprits. Oh for some
traffic wardens!”
Of course back in the UK we’re far too
civilized for that kind of behavour, right?
Sadly not. There are many upsides of being back, but witnessing
the inconsiderate behaviour of car owners who park on pavements is not one of
them. And this is not just an
occasional selfish thug – in my new ‘hood of East Oxford it is widespread to
the point of being normalized.
The Highway Code is clear: “You MUST NOT
park partially or wholly on the pavement in London, and should not do so
elsewhere unless signs permit it. Parking
on the pavement can obstruct and seriously inconvenience pedestrians, people in
wheelchairs or with visual impairments and people with prams or pushchairs”
(section 244).
The problem is that people are not
obeying the rules – and the authorities (police and councils) are not enforcing
them.
So here’s the deal. If you choose to drive (here it’s a
real choice – plenty of busses, great cycling country, easy to walk for most),
then it’s your responsibility to park your car legally and responsibly.
If there is not enough room on the road directly in
front of your house without, say, preventing a fire engine or bin van from
getting through, then you need to find somewhere else to park. What you are not entitled to do is park on the pavement instead. If you do you are breaking the Highway
Code, and you are behaving like a selfish tosser.
As I say, we are fortunate here to have such civilized
amenities as pavements and public toilets.
So answer me this: if I visit a public convenience, I have just
as much right as anyone to do my business in one of the loos - agreed? But if all the cubicles are already
being used, what should I do?
Should I wait, or go elsewhere – or do I put my ease and expediency above
the needs and rights of everyone else, and just shit the sink?
In answer to your last question-no!!! I take your point and largely agree but we had a dilemma at our house in St. Ives as we lived on the corner of a busy narrow bend at the top of the hill which quickly twisted to another narrow bend. Many used to race around this as if on a chicane! There was only room for one car on our drive so, to avoid accidents, glares and curses we used to park half up and half down in the interest of other car users and hoping to have a car in one piece in the morning! Not ideal at all but a justifiable compromise. Obviously, it was bad design in the first place....
ReplyDeleteI understand the dilemma - it's one that most car owners in East Oxford seem to have too!
ReplyDeleteBasically they want to park conveniently for them, directly outside their house. Unfortunately there's not enough room to do that considerately for others.
So they have a choice:
1) Convenience for them: park outside the house anyway - convenient for them, but highly inconsiderate as it blocks the pavement
OR
2) Consideration for others: park further away from the house - less convenient for them, but considerate of other people including pedestrians and also road users
Now Mr Paul, I know you to be a good and considerate man, so forgive me for pointing out that parking partly on the pavement and partly on the road doesn't get you out of this choice - it is still number 1), choosing convenience at the cost of consideration.
Or do you think just having a wee in the sink is a 'justifiable compromise'? ;-)
I think in the case of our housing estate there was a lot of bad design! Large, 4 bedroom houses (bound to have more than one car!!!) with short driveways along narrow, windy roads. Some people paved extra areas to create more parking but then that annoys the "don't pave the lawn, we need the oxygen" brigade too!!! It was our rented house so we couldn't do much about it. As for weeing in the sink - up against a wall or tree would be better(like in Cambodia!!!). I do agree with you really and I used to rant about it as well! Now, I'll go for a coffee at Gloria Jean's and walk in the road around the cars on the pavement to get to it!!
ReplyDelete